Skip to content
The Funder File

Sectors

After School Program Grant Proposal Sample: Need, Outcomes and Safeguarding

Checked against official sources · 5 min read

A strong after-school proposal lets a reviewer picture three things: the hours between the school bell and the time parents get home, what young people gain from your program, and how you keep them safe. Here is a section-by-section sample approach for a small youth program, with the public data, indicators and compliance points funders in this field know.

Where after-school funding comes from

Most small programs combine foundations, community foundations, businesses and donors, sometimes with public money passed through a school or state agency. The main dedicated federal source is the Nita M. Lowey 21st Century Community Learning Centers program (21st CCLC). According to the U.S. Department of Education's program page, the Department awards funds to state educational agencies, which run statewide competitions and award subgrants; community-based organizations are among the eligible entities.

Even if you never apply, your state's 21st CCLC page often lists the organizations already funded, which can become partners.

A sample need statement built on public data

Pair one local public figure with one of your own, and always note the data year. These sources are online:

  • American Community Survey (U.S. Census Bureau): child poverty, school enrollment and language spoken at home by geography. Use 5-year estimates for small areas.
  • KIDS COUNT Data Center (Annie E. Casey Foundation): child well-being indicators in seven topics, including education. Cite each indicator's data year.
  • America After 3PM (Afterschool Alliance): a household survey on after-school participation and unmet demand, with state pages.

A sample you can adapt:

According to the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey ([year] 5-year estimates), [figure] of children in [county] live in households below the poverty level. On [date], our waiting list held [number] young people (program records).

Outputs vs outcomes in youth programs

The W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Logic Model Development Guide calls outputs "the direct products of program activities" and outcomes "specific changes in program participants' behavior, knowledge, skills, status and level of functioning."

Outputs (counted) Outcomes (what changes)
Young people enrolled, and number who attend regularly Improved school-day attendance
Program days and hours offered; average daily attendance Improved grades or GPA; growth on state reading or math assessments
Tutoring or mentoring sessions held Fewer in-school suspensions
Mentors recruited, screened and trained Improved teacher-reported engagement in learning
Family events held; school partners engaged More homework completed; better attitude and motivation toward school

Enrollment is not an outcome. Track attendance per young person and define a regular participant.

Example indicators funders recognize

The Education Department's program page lists five current 21st CCLC measures: growth on state reading and math assessments (grades 4 to 8); improved GPA where the prior-year unweighted GPA was below 3.0 (grades 7 to 8 and 10 to 12); improved attendance where prior-year attendance was at or below 90% (grades 1 to 12); fewer in-school suspensions (grades 1 to 12); and improved teacher-reported engagement (grades 1 to 5). Older state documents show a previous set: use these.

The Urban Institute's Outcome Indicators Project has Youth Tutoring and Youth Mentoring tables but no general after-school table. Examples:

  • Number and percent of students participating in tutoring for a 12-month period (Urban, Youth Tutoring)
  • Number and percent of tutored students whose parents and teachers report improved attitudes and motivation (Urban, Youth Tutoring)
  • Percent of participants in grades 1 to 12 whose prior-year school-day attendance rate was at or below 90% and whose attendance improved (21st CCLC)

Thresholds come from the framework; baselines and targets come from your own data.

Compliance points to mention

  • Student records (FERPA). FERPA protects education records held by schools that receive Department of Education funds. To use grades or attendance, plan for written parental consent or a district data-sharing agreement.
  • Safeguarding policy. CDC guidance for youth-serving organizations covers screening, adult and youth interactions, monitoring, safe environments, responding to concerns and training.
  • Background checks. Requirements come mainly from state law, licensing rules and funders, not one federal rule. Describe the checks you actually run.
  • Photos and stories. Use a minor's photo or story only with written parental consent.

Writing tips

  • Describe a typical afternoon in three sentences.
  • Name your school partner and how often you coordinate.
  • State the dosage: days per week, hours per session, weeks per year.
  • Give your staff-to-youth ratio and staff training.
  • Describe missing services, not "at-risk kids".
  • Name only the 21st CCLC measures you will really track.

The Youth & Education Program Grant Kit lists these example indicators on the Examples tab of Sector_YouthEducation_Logic_Model_TRACKER.xlsx.

General information: this article is general information, not legal, tax or fundraising advice. No template can guarantee funding. Always follow each funder's own guidelines.

The Funder File is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to the U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Census Bureau, the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Afterschool Alliance, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Urban Institute or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Sources

The Funder File is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to any funder or government agency named on this site. All trademarks belong to their owners.

Related guides